create_ux_experience

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate write behavior (readOnlyHint=false). The description adds '[Write]' which is redundant. No additional behavioral traits (e.g., side effects, authorization needs, constraints) are disclosed beyond what annotations or schema provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single efficient sentence with one clarifying tag. It is concise and front-loaded, though some brevity sacrifices depth.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks context about the tool's output, prerequisites (e.g., what an 'app sys_id' is), or the nature of UX Experience configurations. With no output schema and only basic parameter info, the description is incomplete for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description need not add parameter details. The description does not elaborate on parameter semantics beyond what the schema already provides, which is adequate but not enhanced.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new UX Experience (app shell) configuration.' It uses a specific verb ('Create') and resource ('UX Experience'), with a clarifying parenthetical that differentiates it from sibling tools like create_ux_app_route or create_uib_page.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The '**[Write]**' tag is redundant with annotations and does not inform decision-making. Given the extensive list of sibling tools, this lack of context is a significant gap.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.