create_uib_component

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only adds '[Scripting]' which might imply a requirement, but does not disclose side effects, authorization needs, or other behaviors. Annotations already provide basic safety hints; the description adds minimal value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one sentence, 8 words), which is efficient for a simple create tool. However, it could be slightly expanded without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and minimal annotations, the description is too brief. It omits details about the created component, return value, or script requirement implications, making it incomplete for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is high (75%), and the description does not add any parameter-specific meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate as the description is neutral.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and the specific resource ('custom UI Builder component (macroponent)'), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like update_uib_component or list_uib_components. The purpose is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The '[Scripting]' hint is vague and does not explain prerequisites or context for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.