create_uib_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate this is a write operation (readOnlyHint false) and not destructive. The description adds that it registers a route, which is a behavioral detail. However, it does not disclose potential side effects (e.g., required permissions or interactions with other records), which might be important given openWorldHint true.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise, with only two pieces of information. It is front-loaded and contains no unnecessary words. It could be slightly more informative, but overall it is efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters, no output schema, and annotations that indicate it is a write operation, the description is minimal but adequate. It covers the basic function but does not explain the route registration process or what happens after creation. It could be more complete for a creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage, so baseline is 3. The description does not add any additional meaning beyond what the schema provides for each parameter. For example, path and title are self-explanatory, and layout's default value is already documented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a UI Builder page and registers a route. While the verb 'Create' is implicit from the name, the addition of 'with route registration' adds specificity and distinguishes it from other page creation tools like create_portal_page or create_ux_app_route.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description describes what the tool does but does not provide any guidance on when to use it versus alternative tools such as create_uib_component or update_uib_page. No usage context or exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.