Skip to main content
Glama

list-plan-tasks

list-plan-tasks
Read-only

Retrieve all tasks belonging to a Microsoft Planner plan. Use filters, search queries, and pagination to target specific tasks and control the response size.

Instructions

Retrieve a list of plannerTask objects associated with a plannerPlan object.

đź’ˇ TIP: Priority values: 0=Urgent, 1=Important, 3=Medium, 5=Low, 9=unset.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
topNoPage size (Graph $top). Start small (e.g. 5–15) so responses fit the model context; raise only if needed. Use $select to return fewer fields per item. For more rows, use @odata.nextLink from the response instead of a very large $top.
skipNoItems to skip for pagination. Not supported with $search.
countNoSet true to enable advanced query mode (ConsistencyLevel: eventual). Required for complex $filter on flag/flagStatus or contains().
expandNoExpand related entities
filterNoOData filter expression. Add $count=true for advanced filters (flag/flagStatus, contains()). Cannot combine with $search.
searchNoKQL search query — wrap value in double quotes. Cannot combine with $filter.
selectNoComma-separated fields to return, e.g. id,subject,from,receivedDateTime
orderbyNoSort expression, e.g. receivedDateTime desc
fetchAllPagesNoFollow @odata.nextLink and merge up to 100 pages into one response. Can return enormous payloads—only when the user explicitly needs a full export. Prefer a small $top first, then paginate or narrow with $filter/$search.
plannerPlanIdYesPath parameter: plannerPlanId
includeHeadersNoInclude response headers (including ETag) in the response metadata
excludeResponseNoExclude the full response body and only return success or failure indication
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so description does not need to restate safety. The tip about priority values adds contextual behavior, but otherwise no disclosure of rate limits, pagination edge cases, or other traits beyond what the schema and annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: two sentences front-loaded with purpose, followed by a succinct tip. No wasted words; every sentence adds value relative to the structured fields.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a list tool with 12 parameters and no output schema, the description is minimal but just sufficient given the rich parameter descriptions. It lacks overview of return structure, pagination behavior beyond param descriptions, and common use cases. However, the tool name and documentation of parameters convey the core functionality.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all 12 parameters with detailed descriptions, achieving 100% coverage. The description adds only a tip on priority value meaning, which is not parameter-level. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema does the heavy lifting without needing extra description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Retrieve a list of plannerTask objects associated with a plannerPlan object,' using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling list tools (e.g., list-mail-messages) by specifying planner plan tasks, but does not explicitly contrast with closely related tools like list-plan-buckets.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Does not mention prerequisites, recommended query patterns, or situations where other list tools (e.g., list-planner-tasks with different filters) might be more appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Softeria/ms-365-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server