create-onenote-section-page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description claims creation (additive), but annotations mark 'destructiveHint: true', which is a contradiction. No disclosure of side effects, idempotency, or error behavior. The tip about HTML format is the only positive, but overall transparency is poor.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences: purpose stated first, then a tip. No redundancy or filler; every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Core purpose and a crucial input rule are given, but missing: when to use vs. siblings, response shape (no output schema), error handling, and the contradiction with annotations. Adequate for simple use but gaps remain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 75%, but the description adds critical value by specifying that 'body' must be a full HTML document, which the schema does not convey. Other parameters (onenoteSectionId, includeHeaders, excludeResponse) are not explained beyond schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a new page in a specified section, with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from the sibling 'create-onenote-page' by explicitly limiting scope to a section.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives like 'create-onenote-page' or prerequisites (e.g., section existence). The description only includes a format tip, no usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.