create-onenote-section-page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds a useful tip about the body requiring full HTML and mentions silent failure for partial HTML. However, it does not address the destructive hint annotation (destructiveHint=true), which contradicts the additive nature of creating a page. The annotation_contradiction flag is set to true.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: one sentence for purpose and one for a critical tip. Every word is necessary, and it is front-loaded with the primary action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (nested object parameter, no output schema), the description lacks completeness. It does not mention the required 'onenoteSectionId' parameter or the return value, leaving the agent without expectations for the response.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema coverage is 75%, and the description provides crucial information for the 'body' parameter (must be full HTML). This adds significant value beyond the schema. Other parameters are briefly described in the schema but not further elaborated in the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Create a new page in the specified section,' clearly indicating the verb (create) and resource (page in section). It distinguishes from sibling 'create-onenote-page' by specifying the section context, though it does not explicitly differentiate behavior.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'create-onenote-page' or 'create-onenote-section'. The usage context is implied only by the tool name and description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.