update-excel-table-row

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that the operation updates a row and requires a specific body structure ('values: [[...]]'), adding value beyond the schema. Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true, so the description's behavioral detail is adequate but not extensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded but unnecessarily repeats the same text twice (including a tip that duplicates the main sentence). This redundancy reduces conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (multiple required path parameters, no output schema), the description provides minimal context. It mentions the row index being zero-based and the body structure, but omits details like error handling, prerequisites, or response format.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is high (86%), but the description clarifies the body parameter format ('values: [[...]] with one inner array matching the column count'), which is missing from the schema's empty properties definition. This adds meaningful semantic value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (update), resource (a single row in a formal Excel table), and method (by zero-based row index). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'add-excel-table-rows' or 'update-excel-range'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide any guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It lacks explicit context for selection, such as prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.