update-excel-table-row

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate destructiveHint=true. The description adds context about formal Excel tables and zero-based indexing. It does not mention that the entire row is overwritten, but the update behavior is implied.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise, with only one sentence and a redundant tip. It front-loads the purpose but the repetition adds no new information, making it slightly wasteful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers core functionality but lacks response information (no output schema) and usage guidance relative to siblings. It adequately explains the body format but does not mention permissions or side effects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 86% with minimal descriptions for path parameters. The description clarifies the body parameter format (values array with one inner array) and that index is zero-based, adding value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates a single row in a formal Excel table by zero-based row index. It distinguishes from siblings like delete-excel-table-row (delete vs update) and add-excel-table-rows (add multiple rows vs single row).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like update-excel-range or add-excel-table-rows. It implies usage for updating a single row but does not exclude other tools or mention prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.