Skip to main content
Glama
Softeria

Microsoft 365 MCP Server

by Softeria

graph-batch

graph-batch
Destructive

Combine up to 20 Microsoft Graph requests into one HTTP call to reduce round trips, parallelize reads, or sequence dependent writes via dependsOn.

Instructions

Combine up to 20 Graph requests into a single HTTP call. Body: { requests: [{ id: '1', method: 'GET'|'POST'|'PATCH'|'DELETE', url: '/me/messages?$top=5', headers?: {...}, body?: {...}, dependsOn?: ['1'] }, ...] }. Returns { responses: [{ id, status, body, headers }] } in arbitrary order — match by id. Use cases: (1) parallelize many small reads (e.g. fetch 15 mail messages by id in one round-trip); (2) sequence dependent writes via dependsOn; (3) batch many Excel range writes into one call to dramatically reduce latency on large workbook builds. Note: each sub-request URL is relative to the Graph version root (/me/..., /drives/..., NOT https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/...).

šŸ’” TIP: Combine up to 20 Graph requests into a single HTTP call. Body: { requests: [{ id: '1', method: 'GET'|'POST'|'PATCH'|'DELETE', url: '/me/messages?$top=5', headers?: {...}, body?: {...}, dependsOn?: ['1'] }, ...] }. Returns { responses: [{ id, status, body, headers }] } in arbitrary order — match by id. Use cases: (1) parallelize many small reads (e.g. fetch 15 mail messages by id in one round-trip); (2) sequence dependent writes via dependsOn; (3) batch many Excel range writes into one call to dramatically reduce latency on large workbook builds. Note: each sub-request URL is relative to the Graph version root (/me/..., /drives/..., NOT https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/...).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bodyYes
confirmNoFor destructive operations when the confirm gate is enabled (MS365_MCP_REQUIRE_CONFIRM=true; off by default). Set to true only after the user has explicitly approved this action. When the gate is on, calls without confirm: true return { error: "confirmation_required" } without touching user data.
includeHeadersNoInclude response headers (including ETag) in the response metadata
excludeResponseNoExclude the full response body and only return success or failure indication
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructive hint (destructiveHint=true) and readOnly hint false. The description adds that responses are returned in arbitrary order and must be matched by id, which is useful. However, it does not elaborate on authorization needs or rate limits beyond what annotations provide, supplying only moderate added value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is clearly structured and front-loaded with the core purpose. The repeated 'tip' block adds some redundancy but reinforces key information. Overall, it is efficient and well-organized for the complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity, no output schema, and nested objects, the description thoroughly covers return format (responses with id, status, body, headers), arbitrary order, matching by id, URL relativity, and three use cases. It is complete and self-contained.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although the schema covers 75% of parameters with descriptions, the 'body' parameter has no schema definition but is richly detailed in the description with examples and structure. The description compensates for schema gaps, adding meaning about the complex body format, depensOn, and headers.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the tool 'Combine up to 20 Graph requests into a single HTTP call' with a specific verb and resource. It clearly differentiates from sibling tools which are individual Graph operations, making its unique batching purpose unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides three concrete use cases (parallelize reads, sequence dependent writes, batch writes) and a critical note about URL relativity. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it (e.g., for single requests) or compare to alternatives, but the context of siblings implies when batching is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Softeria/ms-365-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server