login
Authenticate your Microsoft account to authorize access to Microsoft 365 services.
Instructions
Authenticate with Microsoft account
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| force | No | Force a new login even if already logged in |
Authenticate your Microsoft account to authorize access to Microsoft 365 services.
Authenticate with Microsoft account
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| force | No | Force a new login even if already logged in |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description lacks any behavioral details such as side effects (token storage, session creation), auth flows, or required permissions. Only the action name is given.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence, front-loaded with the core purpose. However, it may be too terse given the tool's importance.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
As an authentication tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description should cover prerequisites, side effects, and parameter usage. It currently lacks this context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (1 parameter: force boolean). The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Authenticate with Microsoft account' clearly states the verb (authenticate) and resource (Microsoft account), distinguishing it from sibling tools like logout or verify-login.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'select-account' or 'verify-login'. No prerequisites or contextual usage hints are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Softeria/ms-365-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server