Skip to main content
Glama

create-onenote-notebook

create-onenote-notebook
Destructive

Create a OneNote notebook by providing a unique name. Organize notes and content effectively.

Instructions

Create a new OneNote notebook.

💡 TIP: Creates a new OneNote notebook. Body: { displayName: 'Notebook Name' }. The name must be unique across the user's notebooks.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bodyYes
confirmNoFor destructive operations when the confirm gate is enabled (MS365_MCP_REQUIRE_CONFIRM=true; off by default). Set to true only after the user has explicitly approved this action. When the gate is on, calls without confirm: true return { error: "confirmation_required" } without touching user data.
includeHeadersNoInclude response headers (including ETag) in the response metadata
excludeResponseNoExclude the full response body and only return success or failure indication
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark as destructive (destructiveHint=true). Description adds the uniqueness constraint on displayName, which is useful but not comprehensive—does not mention error behavior on duplicate names or side effects like sharing or default notebook creation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very short (two sentences plus tip), but the tip is partially redundant. Front-loads the core purpose. No unnecessary detail, though it could be slightly tighter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema and description does not explain return value. Does not mention the confirm gate parameter, which is important for a destructive operation. Lacks details on user or scope (e.g., current user's notebooks). Missing information about prerequisites or post-conditions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 75% and describes body extensively. Description adds an example body format and the uniqueness rule for displayName, providing modest value beyond the schema. The confirm and other headers are not mentioned.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States 'Create a new OneNote notebook' with a tip clarifying the body format and uniqueness constraint. Clearly identifies the resource and action, though it does not differentiate from siblings like list-onenote-notebooks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., create-onenote-section, create-onenote-page). Does not specify context such as user authentication or typical workflow order.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Softeria/ms-365-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server