create-onenote-notebook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate destructiveHint=true, readOnlyHint=false, and openWorldHint=true. The description adds the uniqueness constraint ('name must be unique'), which provides behavioral context beyond annotations. However, it does not explain error handling or side effects if the name is taken.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short (two sentences) and front-loaded with the purpose. However, the tip partially repeats the first sentence, which is slightly redundant. Still, every word contributes to clarity without excessive verbosity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description does not explain the return value (the created notebook object). It also omits permissions, prerequisites, and scope (though 'user's notebooks' implies current user). The tool is adequately described for basic use but lacks depth for an agent to fully anticipate behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 67% with 3 parameters. The description adds value by providing an example body structure ('Body: { displayName: 'Notebook Name' }'), which clarifies the minimal required input. Other parameters (includeHeaders, excludeResponse) are not elaborated, but their schema descriptions suffice.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new OneNote notebook' with a specific verb and resource. The tip adds the required body format and uniqueness constraint. Among siblings like create-onenote-section and create-onenote-page, this tool is distinctly for notebooks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a helpful tip about the body format and name uniqueness, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives (e.g., create-onenote-section) or when not to use it. No sibling or exclusionary context is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.