create-onenote-notebook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and openWorldHint=true. The description adds the uniqueness constraint for notebook names, which is a behavioral detail beyond annotations. It also implies the tool creates a resource, consistent with destructiveHint. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (two sentences + tip) with minimal redundancy (the first sentence and tip both start with 'Create a new OneNote notebook'). It is front-loaded with the core action. Slight repetition prevents a perfect 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complex input schema and lack of output schema, the description simplifies usage but does not explain the return value or prerequisites (like authentication). It covers the essential creation aspect but leaves gaps about what the tool returns after success.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 67% coverage with many nested properties, but the description highlights the required body.displayName with an example format. This significantly reduces ambiguity for the main parameter. It does not cover includeHeaders/excludeResponse, but those are optional and common.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new OneNote notebook,' which is a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create-onenote-section or create-onenote-page by focusing on notebook creation. The tip adds detail about the required display name and uniqueness constraint, enhancing clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., when not to use it, or when to use list-onenote-notebooks instead). It only states the action and a constraint, but lacks context for decision-making among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.