Skip to main content
Glama

list-contact-folder-child-folders

Read-only

Retrieve immediate sub-folders within a contact folder to navigate nested folder structures in Microsoft 365.

Instructions

Get a collection of child folders under the specified contact folder.

đź’ˇ TIP: Lists immediate sub-folders under a given contact folder. Returns id, displayName, parentFolderId. Use list-contact-folders to discover top-level folders, then this tool to traverse one level deeper. Supports $filter, $top, $orderby. Note: contact folders are typically a flat list in Outlook clients, but Graph allows nesting via this endpoint.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
topNoPage size (Graph $top). Start small (e.g. 5–15) so responses fit the model context; raise only if needed. Use $select to return fewer fields per item. For more rows, use @odata.nextLink from the response instead of a very large $top.
skipNoItems to skip for pagination. Not supported with $search.
searchNoKQL search query — wrap value in double quotes. Cannot combine with $filter.
filterNoOData filter expression. Add $count=true for advanced filters (flag/flagStatus, contains()). Cannot combine with $search.
countNoSet true to enable advanced query mode (ConsistencyLevel: eventual). Required for complex $filter on flag/flagStatus or contains().
orderbyNoSort expression, e.g. receivedDateTime desc
selectNoComma-separated fields to return, e.g. id,subject,from,receivedDateTime
expandNoExpand related entities
contactFolderIdYesPath parameter: contactFolderId
fetchAllPagesNoFollow @odata.nextLink and merge up to 100 pages into one response. Can return enormous payloads—only when the user explicitly needs a full export. Prefer a small $top first, then paginate or narrow with $filter/$search.
includeHeadersNoInclude response headers (including ETag) in the response metadata
excludeResponseNoExclude the full response body and only return success or failure indication
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is clear. The description adds value by specifying that the tool returns immediate sub-folders with fields id, displayName, parentFolderId, and notes that Outlook clients typically have flat lists but Graph allows nesting. This provides useful behavioral context beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, consisting of a clear purpose statement, a tip, and a note about Outlook behavior. It is front-loaded and each sentence provides useful context without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of 12 parameters and no output schema, the description is fairly complete. It explains the one-level traversal and hint about using list-contact-folders first. Annotations provide safety context. Some users might want more detail on pagination mechanics, but the parameter descriptions cover that.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with detailed descriptions for all 12 parameters. The description does not add significantly to the parameter semantics; it only reinforces the overall workflow. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema carries the burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: retrieving child folders under a specified contact folder. It distinguishes itself from related tools by specifying it handles one level deeper than list-contact-folders, and is not for listing contacts (list-contact-folder-contacts).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides guidance on when to use this tool: after using list-contact-folders to get top-level folders, then traverse one level deeper. It mentions that nesting is possible via Graph API, implying the tool is for that purpose. However, it does not explicitly state alternative tools for deeper nesting or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Softeria/ms-365-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server