create-onenote-page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description includes a critical tip about the body format (full HTML required) and warns that partial HTML fails silently or creates malformed pages. This adds behavioral context beyond annotations. No contradiction with annotations (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=true is not elaborated but not contradicted).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is relatively concise with two paragraphs and a tip. It front-loads the main purpose and uses a bullet/tip for key formatting info. Could be slightly more streamlined, but no unnecessary sentences.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema is present, yet the description does not mention what the tool returns (e.g., the created page object). It also omits details on authentication, permissions, or side effects beyond the HTML tip. Given the nested object schema, more contextual info about return values would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 2 of 3 top-level parameters (body, includeHeaders, excludeResponse) with descriptions. The description adds essential guidance for the body parameter (must be full HTML), which is not in the schema. The other parameters are adequately described in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a OneNote page in the default section/default notebook, and provides guidance on using sectionName for other sections. It distinguishes the default-notebook scope from other approaches, aligning well with sibling tools like create-onenote-section-page.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says to use this for the default notebook and mentions the sectionName query parameter for different sections. It hints at alternative approaches for other notebooks, though it does not directly name sibling tools or specify when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.