autotask_get_quote

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does not disclose what the output includes (e.g., full quote with line items) or any side effects. Since it's a simple GET, the minimal transparency is slightly acceptable but still lacking detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence with no extraneous words. It is front-loaded and efficient. Every word serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (one required parameter, no output schema, no nested objects), the description is adequate but could be improved by mentioning what the response contains (e.g., 'returns the full quote object including items and pricing'). Without that, it is minimally complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with the quoteId parameter described as 'The quote ID to retrieve'. The description adds only 'by ID', which is already implied. Thus the description provides limited added value beyond the schema, meeting the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get a specific quote by ID' clearly states the action (Get), the resource (a specific quote), and the method (by ID). It distinguishes from siblings like autotask_search_quotes which retrieves multiple quotes, and autotask_create_quote which creates new ones.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as autotask_search_quotes. The description does not explain that get_quote is for retrieving a single known quote, while search_quotes is for filtering or listing. No when-not or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.