Skip to main content
Glama
asachs01

Autotask MCP Server

by asachs01

autotask_create_task

Create a new task in Autotask by specifying project ID, title, and status. Optionally set type, description, dates, estimated hours, and assigned resource.

Instructions

Create a new task in Autotask

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
titleYesTask title
statusYesTask status (1=New, 2=In Progress, 5=Complete)
taskTypeNoTask type (1=FixedWork, 2=FixedDuration). Defaults to 1.
projectIDYesProject ID for the task
descriptionNoTask description
endDateTimeNoTask end date/time (ISO format)
startDateTimeNoTask start date/time (ISO format)
estimatedHoursNoEstimated hours for the task
assignedResourceIDNoAssigned resource ID
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only states that it creates a task, but does not disclose any behavioral traits such as idempotency, authentication requirements, side effects, or return value. Since no annotations are provided, the description should carry the burden of behavioral disclosure, which it fails to do.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (one sentence) but it is too brief to be informative. It could include more relevant information without being overly verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that there is no output schema and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what the tool returns, how errors are handled, or any important context beyond the basic action.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description does not add any additional meaning beyond what the schema provides. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate given the high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and the resource ('task') and the system ('Autotask'). However, it does not differentiate this tool from other create tools among siblings (e.g., create_ticket, create_phase), which all have similar descriptions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or scenarios where this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/asachs01/autotask-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server