autotask_get_opportunity
Retrieve a specific opportunity from Autotask by its unique ID.
Instructions
Get a specific opportunity by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| opportunityId | Yes | The opportunity ID to retrieve |
Retrieve a specific opportunity from Autotask by its unique ID.
Get a specific opportunity by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| opportunityId | Yes | The opportunity ID to retrieve |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided. The description does not disclose behavioral traits beyond the basic action (e.g., read-only, permissions, side effects). It adds no extra context beyond 'Get'.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that is concise and front-loaded. Every word is necessary.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is complete enough. It adequately informs the agent of the tool's purpose and required input.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the one parameter. The description does not add any additional meaning beyond what the schema already states about opportunityId.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get a specific opportunity by ID' clearly states the action (Get), the resource (opportunity), and the method (by ID). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like autotask_search_opportunities which would search for opportunities.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies use when you have a specific opportunity ID, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., search). No guidance on when not to use or conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/asachs01/autotask-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server