Skip to main content
Glama

Search API docs

godot_api_search
Read-only

Find Godot class reference entries matching a query, including class names, methods, members, and signals. Returns results ranked by relevance for the target version.

Instructions

Search the Godot class reference for the target version: matches class names, brief descriptions, and method/member/signal names. Returns ranked hits.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum items to return.
queryYesWhat to search for, e.g. "CharacterBody2D", "move_and_slide", "tween".
versionNoGodot version to use, e.g. "4.7", "4.7-stable", "stable"/"latest". Defaults to the project's declared version, then the latest stable release.
project_rootNoPath to the Godot project root (folder containing project.godot). Defaults to $GODOT_PROJECT_ROOT or an upward search from the working directory.
response_formatNoOutput format. "markdown" is human-readable; "json" is structured.markdown
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, but description adds minimal behavioral detail. It mentions 'ranked hits' but does not disclose pagination, rate limits, or query limitations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with two clauses; concise and front-loaded with key information. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequately describes the search function and return type. Could mention default version behavior or limit, but parameters handle those. For a tool with no output schema, it is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all 5 parameters with descriptions; the description adds context about search matching but does not enhance per-parameter meaning beyond schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate as schema is complete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states verb 'Search' and resource 'Godot class reference' with specifics on what is matched (class names, brief descriptions, method/member/signal names). Does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like godot_api_doc, but purpose is well-defined.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., godot_api_doc). The description does not mention trade-offs, prerequisites, or context-specific recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Fulviuus/godot-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server