game_audio_spatial

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are minimal (only title), so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Configure' without stating that it modifies the node's spatial properties, whether changes are reversible, or what permissions are needed. No mention of side effects or the 'get_info' action's behavior. Lacks essential transparency for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with no fluff. However, it could be slightly more informative without losing conciseness. Still, it earns a high score for efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 6 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is insufficient. It doesn't explain the 'action' parameter (configure vs. get_info) or what 'get_info' returns. The tool's full behavior is unclear, especially for a dual-purpose tool. More context is needed for completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so each parameter is already described in the schema (e.g., maxDb, action). The description adds that these are 'spatial properties', but this is somewhat inferred from the tool name. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the description provides only marginal extra meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Configure AudioStreamPlayer3D spatial properties', specifying the verb and the exact resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like game_audio_play (playing audio) and game_audio_bus (bus layout) by focusing on spatial properties of a specific node type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like game_audio_play or game_audio_bus. It doesn't mention prerequisites (e.g., node must exist) or situations where 'get_info' vs 'configure' is appropriate. The description is purely declarative without usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.