Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official
by Crawlora-org
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

vanityfair_sections

Fetch Vanity Fair section inventory, including Hollywood, Arts & Culture, Politics, Business, and Style, plus sub-verticals and public listing links.

Instructions

Get Vanity Fair sections. Returns the Vanity Fair section inventory: Hollywood (plus its Movies, Television, and Award Season sub-verticals), Arts & Culture, Politics, Business, and Style (plus its Beauty, Fashion, and Royals sub-verticals), each linking to its public listing page.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.17.5

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the behavioral burden. It states that the tool returns the section inventory and that each section links to its public listing page, making the read-only, informational nature apparent. It does not address errors or edge cases, but nothing in a static section listing demands that.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-organized sentence that front-loads the purpose and then lists the specific sections. 'Get Vanity Fair sections' and 'Returns the Vanity Fair section inventory' are slightly redundant, but the enumeration earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless sections-inventory tool, the description is complete: it names the publication, enumerates the sections and sub-sections, and states that each will link to its public listing page. No output schema is needed to understand what this tool returns.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters and the schema is complete, so there are no parameter semantics to document. The description adds context about what the returned inventory contains, which is more than needed for an empty input schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Get Vanity Fair sections,' clearly naming the verb and resource, then enumerates the exact section inventory (Hollywood with sub-verticals, Arts & Culture, Politics, Business, Style with sub-verticals). This makes it easy for an agent to distinguish this tool from sibling tools like vanityfair_article, vanityfair_headlines, or vanityfair_news.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use it: when an agent needs Vanity Fair's section list or the URLs to section listing pages. It provides no explicit when-not-to-use guidance or named alternatives, but for a zero-parameter directory tool the intended context is reasonably clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools