Fetch Gulf News top stories across all sections. Returns titles, article URLs, publication times, and lead images; takes no parameters.
Get Gulf News top stories. Returns the latest Gulf News stories across all sections, with no parameters. Each item has its title, canonical article URL, publication time and lead image. The listing carries no summary text.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.17.5Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and largely meets it: it enumerates the returned fields (title, canonical URL, publication time, lead image) and discloses a useful negative trait ('carries no summary text'), which prevents wasted follow-up calls. It does not cover pagination, freshness window, or rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Three sentences, front-loaded with purpose and followed by output shape and limitation. Only 'with no parameters' mildly duplicates the schema, otherwise every sentence earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema exists, so the description's field-level enumeration is genuinely necessary and it delivers it, plus a limitation caveat. For a zero-parameter feed, this is nearly complete; only pagination/freshness behavior is unstated.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline of 4 applies. The description correctly notes 'with no parameters', matching the empty schema, though it adds nothing beyond that.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb+resource ('Get Gulf News top stories') and clarifies scope ('across all sections'). The purpose is unambiguous, but the description never distinguishes itself from near-identical siblings like gulfnews_headlines or gulfnews_sections, leaving the agent to infer the difference.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no explicit when-to-use, when-not, or alternative routing, despite dozens of sibling news tools (gulfnews_article, gulfnews_headlines, gulfnews_sections). 'Top stories across all sections' weakly implies a general feed, but no selection guidance is given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.