Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora MCP

Crawlora MCP

Official

reddit_trends

Fetch Reddit hot, new, rising, or top posts to spot trending topics across public feeds. Filter by time window and paginate results.

Instructions

List Reddit trends. Returns public posts from broad Reddit hot, new, rising, or top feeds. For subreddit-specific trends, use /reddit/subreddit/{subreddit}/posts with sort=hot, sort=new, sort=rising, or sort=top. A 503 with a Retry-After header means Reddit is temporarily throttling the request; wait that many seconds and retry. If source.type is redlib, public fields and credit weights are preserved.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sortNoSort: hot, new, rising, or top
timeNoTime window for top sort: hour, day, week, month, year, or all
afterNoReddit pagination token
limitNoMaximum posts, defaults to 25 and clamps to 100

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.17.5
    • addedInput schema / properties / sort / enum
      Added value: +[
      +  "hot",
      +  "new",
      +  "rising",
      +  "top"
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / time / enum
      Added value: +[
      +  "hour",
      +  "day",
      +  "week",
      +  "month",
      +  "year",
      +  "all"
      +]
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv1.5.0
    • removedInput schema / properties / with_scores
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "When true, source score and comment_count from old.reddit HTML rather than the default (slower)",
      -  "type": "boolean"
      -}
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv1.2.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / with_scores
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "When true, source score and comment_count from old.reddit HTML rather than the default (slower)",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  4. Addedv1.1.0

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden and does well: it discloses that posts are public, that Reddit may throttle with a 503 plus Retry-After header and how to react, and that redlib-sourced responses preserve public fields and credit weights. It stops short of stating auth requirements or how pagination interacts with repeated calls, so a 4 rather than a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences, each carrying distinct load: purpose, the alternative route, the error-handling contract, and the data-source caveat. Purpose is front-loaded and nothing is repeated from the schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a no-annotation, no-output-schema tool with four parameters, the description covers the operational essentials (scope, sibling routing, throttle handling). It leaves minor gaps around pagination mechanics via the `after` token and any auth expectations, but nothing that would cause a mis-call.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and both enums are documented in the schema, so the description only echoes the sort options already enumerated. It adds no syntax or interaction detail (e.g., that `time` only applies to `sort=top`) beyond what the schema provides, which is the baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('List Reddit trends') and immediately scopes it to broad Reddit hot/new/rising/top feeds as opposed to subreddit-scoped feeds. An agent can distinguish it from the sibling reddit_subreddit_posts without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly names the alternative endpoint (`/reddit/subreddit/{subreddit}/posts`) and the exact `sort` values that select it, so the routing decision between broad and subreddit-scoped trends is fully specified. No when-to-use inference is left to the agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools