Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

reddit_trends

Fetch and list Reddit trends from hot, new, rising, or top feeds, with sort, time window, pagination, and limit options for normalized public posts.

Instructions

List Reddit trends. Returns normalized public posts from broad Reddit hot, new, rising, or top feeds. For subreddit-specific trends, use /reddit/subreddit/{subreddit}/posts with sort=hot, sort=new, sort=rising, or sort=top. A 503 with a Retry-After header means Reddit is temporarily throttling the request; wait that many seconds and retry. Native-source failures can use the internal Redlib fallback; source.type is redlib and public fields/credit weights are preserved.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sortNoSort: hot, new, rising, or top
timeNoTime window for top sort: hour, day, week, month, year, or all
afterNoReddit pagination token
limitNoMaximum posts, defaults to 25 and clamps to 100

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.17.5
    • addedInput schema / properties / sort / enum
      Added value: +[
      +  "hot",
      +  "new",
      +  "rising",
      +  "top"
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / time / enum
      Added value: +[
      +  "hour",
      +  "day",
      +  "week",
      +  "month",
      +  "year",
      +  "all"
      +]
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv1.5.0
    • removedInput schema / properties / with_scores
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "When true, source score and comment_count from old.reddit HTML rather than the default (slower)",
      -  "type": "boolean"
      -}
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv1.2.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / with_scores
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "When true, source score and comment_count from old.reddit HTML rather than the default (slower)",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  4. Addedv1.1.0

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the behavioral burden and does so well: it discloses throttling behavior (503 + Retry-After with wait-and-retry), an internal Redlib fallback on native-source failure, and that public fields and credit weights are preserved. It stops short of covering auth requirements or exact result-shape caveats, so it is strong but not exhaustive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with purpose, then routing, then error handling, then fallback semantics — a logical escalation with no filler sentences. It is slightly dense with niche operational detail (Redlib/credit weights) that most calls will not need, which keeps it just under top marks.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema and no annotations, so the description must cover behavior, and it covers the critical pieces: what is returned (normalized public posts), the throttling contract, and failure fallback. Pagination semantics (after/limit interplay) are left to the schema, a minor gap for a paged list tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and each parameter (sort, time, after, limit) is already documented with enums and defaults in the schema. The description only echoes the sort feeds and adds no format, syntax, or interaction detail beyond that, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('List Reddit trends') and immediately scopes it to broad hot/new/rising/top feeds. It also explicitly differentiates itself from the sibling tool reddit_subreddit_posts, so an agent can route without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit alternative and the exact condition that selects it ('For subreddit-specific trends, use /reddit/subreddit/{subreddit}/posts with sort=...'). It additionally tells the agent what to do on a 503 with Retry-After, which is real operational guidance rather than inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools