ubereats_store_reviews

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description discloses key traits: returns a snapshot rather than full feed, empty list for stores without reviews, and credential-free public data. This goes beyond minimal requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences, each adding distinct value: purpose, return contents, limitation, edge case, and auth status. No redundant text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description fully explains return values (rating, count, sample reviews including fields) and handles edge cases. For a single-parameter tool, this is complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a descriptive store_id field that explains source and format. Description adds no additional parameter detail, but none is needed given the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States 'Get UberEats store reviews' with specific contents (aggregate rating, review count, sample of recent reviews with reviewer name/text/date). Clearly distinguishable from sibling tools like ubereats_store and ubereats_feed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides context on scope (single on-page snapshot, not a full paginated feed), implying when not to use it, and notes credential-free access. Doesn't explicitly name alternative tools but the limitation is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.