Fetch top stories and teaser summaries from Benzinga's public RSS feed to monitor market headlines and updates.
Get Benzinga top stories. Returns current Benzinga stories and teaser summaries from its public RSS feed.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.17.9Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the behavioral burden. It discloses that content comes from a public RSS feed, which usefully implies no auth and a feed-style result. It does not mention freshness, pagination, ordering, or rate-limit behavior, but the RSS disclosure is genuine added context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short sentences, front-loaded with the core action and followed by source detail. Nothing is wasted, though it is terse to the point of under-specifying usage.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
A zero-parameter feed tool needs little, and the source (public RSS) is stated. But with four sibling Benzinga tools and no output schema, the description omits anything that would let an agent know why this feed differs from benzinga_headlines or benzinga_news.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate at the parameter level. Baseline 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource (get Benzinga top stories) and adds the data source detail. However, it does not distinguish itself from close siblings like benzinga_headlines, benzinga_news, benzinga_sections, or benzinga_search, so an agent cannot infer which to pick from purpose alone.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this versus the sibling tools (benzinga_headlines, benzinga_sections, benzinga_search). The description implies it fetches a general feed, but gives no exclusions or routing cues.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.