Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora MCP

Crawlora MCP

Official

townhall_news

Fetch top stories, news, and opinion columns from Townhall, returning titles, URLs, summaries, authors, images, and publication times in reverse chronological order.

Instructions

Get Townhall top stories. Returns the latest Townhall stories, news and opinion columns mixed, newest first, about 50 items. Each has its title, URL, short summary, publication time, author byline and lead image. Video pages are left out. Takes no parameters.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.17.5

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full load and does well: it discloses the count (~50), ordering (newest first), content mix (news + opinion), return fields, and an explicit exclusion (video pages). It omits auth/rate-limit/error behavior, but the return-shape disclosure is stronger than typical.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the core action, then a tight run of detail sentences with no filler. Every sentence adds information about the result set; only the enumerated field list is slightly list-like.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description must describe returns, and it does: item count, ordering, and per-item fields. For a no-parameter feed tool this is largely complete, missing only call-context details like failure or rate behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes no parameters and the description states this explicitly ('Takes no parameters'), matching the empty schema. Baseline for a zero-parameter tool is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb+resource ('Get Townhall top stories') and details scope (news and opinion mixed, newest first, ~50 items). It's clear what it does, but it doesn't differentiate itself from the sibling townhall_headlines, so an agent must guess between the two.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: 'top stories' signals a general front-page feed, but the description never says when to use this versus townhall_headlines, townhall_article or townhall_sections. No exclusions or prerequisites are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools