Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

playstation_concept

Fetch PlayStation Store metadata for a game hub by concept ID, returning title, publisher, platforms, genres, ratings, editions, add-ons, and regional pricing.

Instructions

Get PlayStation Store details for a concept (game hub). Returns normalized store metadata for a PlayStation concept: title, publisher, release date, platforms, genres, description, content rating, aggregate star rating, the default product's purchase price, media, and the full lists of purchasable editions and add-ons. cc selects the store region (and price currency); l accepts a language code or locale such as en or en-US, with the locale's primary language used for text. Credential-free public PlayStation Store data.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
lNoLanguage code
ccNoStore country code (ISO, selects currency)
idYesNumeric PlayStation concept id

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.5.0

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral disclosure burden. It explicitly states 'Credential-free public PlayStation Store data', explains that l uses the locale's primary language, and cc selects region/currency. It implies a read operation via 'Get'. It does not mention rate limits or response size, but those are minor given the tool's nature.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded. The first sentence states the purpose and lists all returned fields without excess, the parameter explanations are concise, and the credential-free note is a short sentence. No filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Since there is no output schema, the description must explain what the tool returns, and it does so exhaustively by listing all fields. It also explains parameters and their effects, and notes the credential-free nature. Nothing needed to call the tool correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds meaningful extra detail: for l, it specifies locale formats like en-US and that the primary language is used; for cc, it adds that it selects the store region in addition to currency. This goes beyond the schema's terse descriptions, adding value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Get) and resource (PlayStation Store details for a concept), and it differentiates from sibling tools like playstation_product by explicitly targeting 'concept (game hub)'. It also enumerates the exact data returned, making the purpose unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context: it is for a concept (game hub) and explains how the cc and l parameters affect region and language. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use this tool, which is relevant given the many PlayStation-related siblings. The context is clear but lacks exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools