Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

playstation_concept

Retrieve PlayStation Store details for a game hub by concept ID: metadata, editions, add-ons, price, media, ratings, platforms, and genres. Set country code for currency and language for text.

Instructions

Get PlayStation Store details for a concept (game hub). Returns store metadata for a PlayStation concept: title, publisher, release date, platforms, genres, description, content rating, aggregate star rating, the default product's purchase price, media, and the full lists of purchasable editions and add-ons. cc selects the store region (and price currency); l accepts a language code or locale such as en or en-US, with the locale's primary language used for text.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
lNoLanguage code
ccNoStore country code (ISO, selects currency)
idYesNumeric PlayStation concept id

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.5.0

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the behavioral burden. It discloses the returned metadata categories and explains that cc controls region/currency while l controls localized text, but it does not mention auth, rate limits, pagination, or error behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the action and return scope. The long second sentence earns its length by enumerating return fields in the absence of an output schema, and there is no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, but the description enumerates the key returned metadata including editions and add-ons. It omits how to obtain a concept id and any pagination or error caveats, so it is not fully exhaustive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds useful meaning for cc (store region and price currency) and l (language code or locale with primary-language fallback) beyond what the schema provides, while id remains schema-documented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Get PlayStation Store details for a concept') and identifies the concept as the game hub, which separates it from product/category endpoints. It does not explicitly name or contrast sibling tools such as playstation_product or playstation_category.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance and no alternatives. The agent must infer that a numeric concept id is required and that other endpoints exist for search or product-specific data.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools