imdb_title_quotes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must convey all behavioral traits. It states the output is 'normalized public IMDb quote rows' but does not disclose potential side effects, error conditions, data freshness, or authentication needs. The description is adequate but lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two short sentences with no unnecessary words. It conveys the core purpose and a critical usage rule efficiently, earning its place without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with two optional parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate but could be more complete. It does not describe the structure of the returned quote rows, pagination, or behavior when parameters are both provided or missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already describes both parameters with 100% coverage. The description adds value by specifying that exactly one of `id` or `url` should be passed, clarifying their mutual exclusivity beyond the schema's description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns 'normalized public IMDb quote rows for a title'. It uses a specific verb ('Returns') and resource ('quote rows'), and distinguishes from sibling tools like imdb_title_reviews or imdb_title_trivia by focusing on quotes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a clear usage instruction: 'Pass exactly one of `id` or `url`'. However, it does not explain when to use this tool over alternatives, such as other imdb_title_* tools, which are numerous in the sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.