Fetch Business Standard headlines from its public home-page feed to monitor current business news as structured JSON.
Get Business Standard top stories. Returns fresh Business Standard (business-standard.com) top stories from its public home-page feed.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.17.5Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It adds useful context: the data is fresh and comes from a public home-page feed, implying a non-authenticated read operation. It does not describe output shape, number of stories, or pagination, but for a zero-parameter fetch this is a reasonable level of disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is short and front-loaded with the action. However, the second sentence repeats 'Business Standard top stories' from the first, so it is slightly redundant and could be compressed to a single sentence.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
As a zero-parameter, no-output-schema tool, the description is nearly sufficient: it states source, freshness, and scope. What is missing is an indication of what the returned 'top stories' data contains (titles, links, snippets) and how it differs from the sibling businessstandard_headlines endpoint.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema is empty and schema coverage is trivially 100%, so there are no parameter semantics for the description to clarify. Per the baseline for zero-parameter tools, a 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description names a specific verb and resource ('Get Business Standard top stories') and adds the source ('public home-page feed'), so an agent can tell this is a top-stories retrieval tool. It does not explicitly distinguish it from the sibling businessstandard_headlines, which is likely a similar headlines-style endpoint.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies the use case: when fresh Business Standard top stories are needed, call this tool. It provides no explicit guidance on when to prefer it over businessstandard_headlines or other news tools, and no exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.