Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

metacritic_game_critic_reviews

Fetch a Metacritic game's critic reviews by slug to get publication scores, quotes, authors, platforms, and source URLs, with pagination and sorting.

Instructions

List a Metacritic game's critic reviews. Returns paginated professional/publication reviews for a game: publication, score, quote, author, platform, and source URL. Credential-free public Metacritic data.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo1-based page number (default 1)
slugYesMetacritic game slug
sortNoSort order
per_pageNoResults per page (default 20, max 50)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.17.5
    • addedInput schema / properties / sort / enum
      Added value: +[
      +  "date",
      +  "score",
      +  "publication"
      +]
  2. Addedv1.5.0

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It explains that the data is credential-free public Metacritic data, that results are paginated, and what fields are returned. It does not cover invalid-slug behavior or page-termination semantics, but for a list endpoint this is solid coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences with no filler. The first states the purpose, the second details the response shape and pagination, and the third clarifies that no credentials are required. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a low-complexity list tool, the description is nearly complete: the schema covers all parameter semantics, and the description provides the return fields, pagination, and credential requirements. It lacks explicit guidance on choosing among the Metacritic sibling tools and doesn't mention the default sort order, but those are minor gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already describes all four parameters with 100% coverage, including defaults and the sort enum. The description adds general context about the returned review fields, but it does not add parameter-specific semantics beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'List a Metacritic game's critic reviews.' It clearly distinguishes from sibling tools by specifying 'professional/publication reviews' for a 'game,' which separates it from user reviews and movie/TV critic reviews.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus metacritic_game_user_reviews or metacritic_movie_critic_reviews. However, the phrase 'professional/publication reviews' strongly implies critic-review use cases, so the usage context is present but only implicitly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools