Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official
by Crawlora-org
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

coingecko_new_coins

Fetch newly listed cryptocurrencies from CoinGecko's public new-coins table, returning normalized rows with pagination and a chosen quote currency.

Instructions

CoinGecko new cryptocurrencies. Returns normalized rows from CoinGecko's public new cryptocurrencies table. This endpoint supports the documented vs_currency enum.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoPage number, default 1
limitNoRows to return, default 100, max 100
vs_currencyNoQuote currency

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.17.5
    • addedInput schema / properties / vs_currency / enum
      Added value: +[
+  "btc",
+  "eth",
+  "ltc",
+  "bch",
+  "bnb",
+  "eos",
+  "xrp",
+  "xlm",
+  "link",
+  "dot",
+  "yfi",
+  "sol",
+  "usd",
+  "aed",
+  "ars",
+  "aud",
+  "bdt",
+  "bhd",
+  "bmd",
+  "brl",
+  "cad",
+  "chf",
+  "clp",
+  "cny",
+  "czk",
+  "dkk",
+  "eur",
+  "gbp",
+  "gel",
+  "hkd",
+  "huf",
+  "idr",
+  "ils",
+  "inr",
+  "jpy",
+  "krw",
+  "kwd",
+  "lkr",
+  "mmk",
+  "mxn",
+  "myr",
+  "ngn",
+  "nok",
+  "nzd",
+  "php",
+  "pkr",
+  "pln",
+  "rub",
+  "sar",
+  "sek",
+  "sgd",
+  "thb",
+  "try",
+  "twd",
+  "uah",
+  "vef",
+  "vnd",
+  "zar",
+  "xdr",
+  "xag",
+  "xau",
+  "bits",
+  "sats"
+]
  2. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry the behavioral burden. It discloses that rows are 'normalized' and that the source is 'public', which hints at a read-only, no-auth operation. But it omits pagination behavior, rate limits, and what 'new' means, and there is no output schema to clarify the return shape.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded, but the first sentence merely restates the tool name and the third sentence repeats schema information. Only the 'normalized rows from public table' sentence adds real value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description should explain what the returned normalized rows contain and any operational constraints. It does neither, so an agent cannot predict the response shape or know when pagination matters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description's mention of the `vs_currency` enum only restates what the schema already documents; page and limit are left entirely to the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific resource ('CoinGecko's public new cryptocurrencies table') and a clear verb ('Returns'), and the phrase 'new cryptocurrencies' distinguishes it from coingecko_trending or coingecko_markets. However, it does not explicitly contrast with sibling CoinGecko tools, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to choose this tool over coingecko_trending, coingecko_markets, coingecko_coin, or other siblings. The only contextual clue is the name/description itself; there are no exclusions, prerequisites, or alternative recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools