goodreads_book_reviews

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description discloses sorting by like count, returned fields, and credential-free access. It does not mention pagination or error behavior, but covers key behavioral traits beyond minimal info.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences: first states purpose, second adds details on fields and sorting. No wasted words, front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and full parameter schema coverage, the description adequately explains what the tool returns and its behavior. Lacks error handling or rate limit info, but sufficient for a simple read tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description restates parameter details (id, limit with default/max). It adds no new parameter meaning beyond schema, but the mention of returned fields helps understand output context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get a Goodreads book's featured reviews' with specific details on returned fields and sorting. It distinguishes from sibling tools (e.g., goodreads_book, goodreads_author_books) by focusing on featured reviews.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use (for a specific book's featured reviews) and mentions 'Credential-free' which contrasts with tools that may require auth. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use or list alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.