shop_app_shop
Retrieve public merchant profile details from Shop.app using a shop handle.
Instructions
Get Shop.app shop. Returns public Shop.app merchant profile details.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| handle | Yes | Shop handle |
Retrieve public merchant profile details from Shop.app using a shop handle.
Get Shop.app shop. Returns public Shop.app merchant profile details.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| handle | Yes | Shop handle |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It correctly implies a read-only operation and notes the output is 'public', which is adequate for this simple retrieval tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (two sentences, 11 words) with no superfluous information, earning its place efficiently.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple retrieval tool with one required parameter and no output schema, the description provides all necessary information: what it does, what it returns, and the required input.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single parameter 'handle' has a description in the schema ('Shop handle'), and the tool description adds no additional meaning. With 100% schema coverage, the baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get'), the resource ('Shop.app shop'), and the output ('public Shop.app merchant profile details'), making the tool's purpose unambiguous and distinguishable from siblings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., shop_app_shop_locations). The agent must infer usage solely from the name and description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Crawlora-org/crawlora-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server