boxofficemojo_release_group

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does not disclose whether the operation is read-only, requires authentication, has rate limits, or any side effects. The description only states what it returns, lacking behavioral context beyond the basic function.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is composed of two concise sentences with no wasted words. It front-loads the core purpose ('Box Office Mojo release group detail') and immediately follows with the action and parameter guidance. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema and annotations, the description provides a basic understanding of what is returned ('normalized market release rows grouped by region') but lacks details on the structure, any limitations, or usage caveats. It is adequate but not fully comprehensive for a tool with moderate complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with parameter descriptions, but the description adds value by explicitly stating the mutual exclusivity constraint: 'Pass exactly one of id, path, or url.' This clarifies the intended usage beyond the schema which marks all parameters as optional with no constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns 'normalized market release rows grouped by region from a public Box Office Mojo release-group page.' The verb 'Returns' and resource 'release-group page' are specific, and the tool name 'boxofficemojo_release_group' distinguishes it from siblings like boxofficemojo_release and boxofficemojo_title.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus other Box Office Mojo tools. The only usage instruction is 'Pass exactly one of id, path, or url,' which is parameter-level advice, not contextual usage guidance. Sibling tools include many boxofficemojo_* options, yet no alternative selection criteria are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.