datasets_steam_games_search

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden. It conveys that the tool performs a search over a catalog in a search index, implying a read-only operation. It also lists enum values for price_tier, review_tier, and sort. However, it does not disclose pagination behavior, result limits, or return format beyond the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but contains redundancy: 'Search the Steam games dataset' and 'Searches enriched public Steam catalog records' say essentially the same thing. The enum lists are repetitive with the schema but useful. Overall, it's acceptable but not tightly written.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 29 parameters and no output schema, the description is sparse. It doesn't explain what a search result looks like, how results are ordered (beyond sort enums), or any constraints like the offset limit. The schema covers parameters well, but the description lacks return-value context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the description merely repeats the enum values already present in the schema (price_tier, review_tier, sort). It adds no new parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies this as a search tool for the Steam games dataset, using the verb 'Search' and specifying the resource as 'enriched public Steam catalog records stored in a search index.' While it doesn't explicitly contrast with sibling tools, the name and description make it distinct from facet/item tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. There is no mention of when to prefer this over other Steam dataset tools (e.g., facets, item), nor any exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.