Fetch HuffPost top stories from its public homepage as structured JSON for news monitoring and content feeds.
Get HuffPost top stories. Returns fresh HuffPost top stories from its public homepage.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.17.5Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden. It usefully discloses that results are 'fresh' and sourced from the public homepage, implying a read-only, no-auth operation. However, it does not mention output format, pagination, or whether these are brief headlines or full story content.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short sentences with no extraneous content. The slight redundancy between 'Get HuffPost top stories' and 'Returns fresh HuffPost top stories' is minor; the second sentence adds freshness and source context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a parameterless tool with no output schema, the description is mostly self-sufficient. The main gap is the unresolved relationship to huffpost_headlines, which could leave an agent uncertain about which tool returns the desired data.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters and no required inputs, so there is no parameter semantics to clarify. The description correctly implies it needs no arguments, and the empty schema with 100% coverage means nothing is missing.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states a clear verb ('Get') and resource ('HuffPost top stories'), with additional context that they come from the public homepage. However, it does not distinguish itself from the sibling huffpost_headlines, which likely serves a very similar purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is given about when to prefer this tool over huffpost_headlines, huffpost_article, or huffpost_sections. The description implies 'use for top stories' but provides no exclusions or alternative routing.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.