Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Crawlora MCP

Crawlora MCP

Official
by Crawlora-org
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

formula1_meetings

Retrieve a Formula 1 season's Grand Prix weekends in championship order with numeric meeting IDs, archive slugs, dates, and winners—use the meeting ID to select session results.

Instructions

Formula 1 meetings with numeric meeting ids for one season. Returns one season's Grand Prix weekends in championship order with the site's numeric meeting id, the results-archive slug, the Grand Prix name, the weekend date and the winner's race result once the round has run. The meeting id is the only stable race key and is the selector the session-results route takes; on a detail URL the season and slug segments are decorative.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "formula1_meetings"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
seasonNoFour-digit championship year, 1950 through the current season; defaults to the current season example(2026)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.17.20

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full load, and it does disclose real behavior: results are in championship order, the winner field is populated only 'once the round has run', and slug/season segments on detail URLs are decorative. It does not address empty seasons, cancelled rounds, or response size, leaving meaningful gaps for an unannotated tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose and return shape are front-loaded in the first sentence, with supporting detail after. The closing remark about decorative URL segments is slightly tangential but earns its place by warning against deriving the id from a URL.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description must convey the return shape, which it does field by field, including the conditional winner value. For a single optional integer parameter this is close to sufficient; only failure cases and season-boundary behavior are unstated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the single 'season' parameter is already fully documented (four-digit year, 1950 to current, defaults to current season). The description adds only the loose phrasing 'one season's', and specifically omits that the parameter may be omitted entirely to get the current season.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific resource and scope: 'one season's Grand Prix weekends in championship order', and enumerates the returned fields (meeting id, slug, Grand Prix name, weekend date, winner result). It does not name a sibling tool to contrast against, but the detail about which identifier is the stable race key implicitly separates it from slug- or JSON-oriented meeting tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: the reader infers this is the tool for listing a season's race weekends, and the note that the meeting id 'is the selector the session-results route takes' hints at the hand-off to the session-results tool. There is no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or named alternative for season-level meeting lookups.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools