Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora MCP

Crawlora MCP

Official

domain_rdap_ip

Retrieves IP allocation data for public IPv4 or IPv6 addresses via one RIR RDAP lookup.

Instructions

Get IP allocation data. Performs one RIR RDAP lookup for a public IPv4 or IPv6 address.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "ip": "<ip>"
    },
    "name": "domain_rdap_ip"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ipYesPublic IPv4 or IPv6 address

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.17.20

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden; it does disclose that exactly one RIR lookup is performed and that only public addresses are valid, which implies private/reserved IPs will not resolve. It omits auth requirements, rate limits, and what happens for unallocated addresses.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the purpose and followed by the execution mechanism. No filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter read-only lookup with no output schema, this covers the essentials: what it returns conceptually and that it is one registry query. Error/empty-result behavior is the only notable omission.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter exists and the schema already documents it at 100% coverage ("Public IPv4 or IPv6 address"). The description's phrasing of the constraint is essentially a restatement, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ("Get IP allocation data") plus the mechanism ("one RIR RDAP lookup") and the input domain (public IPv4 or IPv6). An agent can tell this is the IP-registry lookup rather than the domain RDAP sibling, though no sibling is named explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description never says when to use this versus alternatives, nor any exclusion beyond the word "public" in the address constraint. An agent must infer that domain_rdap_domain handles hostnames and this handles addresses.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools