roblox_search

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It discloses that searches are anonymous and public, and explains the page_token continuation for pagination. However, it does not mention result format, limits, or side effects (though search is inherently read-only). This is adequate but minimal for a search tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, with the primary purpose front-loaded. Every sentence adds value, and the description is efficient without fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple search tool with no output schema, the description does not explain the return format or fields. It mentions pagination but leaves the agent to infer what results look like. While typical for search tools, it could be more explicit about returning game experiences or IDs.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for both parameters, and the description adds a useful clarification that page_token continues the same search, enhancing the schema's 'returned by a previous search' note. This provides practical guidance on how to use the parameter beyond the schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches Roblox experiences, specifying it targets anonymous public game experiences. It distinguishes itself from siblings like roblox_game (which likely fetches details of a specific game) by focusing on search functionality.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly mention when to use this tool versus alternatives. It implies a search use case but does not state exclusions or direct users to roblox_game for known game IDs. This is a gap for agents comparing sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.