Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

rothys_collections

List available storefront collections from Rothy's with pagination and configurable limits, returning JSON for catalog browsing and product grouping.

Instructions

List Rothy's collections. Returns collections from Rothy's (https://www.rothys.com). The storefront URL is fixed server-side. Valid empty result pages return 200 with an empty collections array.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo1-based page, defaults to 1
limitNoMaximum collections, defaults to 50 and supports up to 250

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.16.0

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It usefully discloses two non-obvious traits: the storefront URL is fixed server-side (so there is no store/URL parameter to supply) and an empty result page still returns HTTP 200 with an empty array. It does not describe the shape of a returned collection or pagination termination, leaving a gap for a list endpoint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, purpose front-loaded, and each subsequent sentence carries a distinct fact (source site, fixed URL, empty-page semantics). No filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple paginated read endpoint with fully documented parameters and no annotations, the description covers the essentials and adds the useful empty-result nuance. With no output schema it could say more about the fields a collection contains, but nothing needed to invoke the tool correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% — both `page` (1-based, defaults to 1) and `limit` (defaults 50, max 250) are fully documented in the schema. The description adds nothing beyond that, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a clear verb and resource: "List Rothy's collections." An agent knows exactly what it returns. However, it never distinguishes itself from the very similar sibling rothys_collection_products (which lists products within a collection), so the boundary between the two must be inferred from the name alone.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of any alternative tool. The agent gets no help deciding between this, rothys_collection_products, or rothys_pages for a given task.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools