Fetch Newsweek article metadata and body paragraphs from a canonical URL to extract structured content for analysis or archiving.
Get Newsweek article content. Returns public Newsweek article metadata and body paragraphs from a canonical article URL.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | Canonical Newsweek article URL |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.17.5Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions 'public' content and the return shape, but does not explicitly state that this is a read-only operation, nor does it mention failure modes, rate limits, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short sentences with no filler. The primary action and return value are front-loaded, and the input constraint is stated clearly. Every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-parameter retrieval tool, the description covers the input and the nature of the output ('metadata and body paragraphs'). It lacks explicit read-only confirmation and usage guidance, but the low complexity and complete schema coverage make the description largely sufficient.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, and the URL parameter is already described as 'Canonical Newsweek article URL'. The description adds context about what is returned but no additional meaning about the parameter itself, so the baseline of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states a specific verb ('Get'), resource ('Newsweek article'), and scope ('canonical article URL'), and specifies the return content ('metadata and body paragraphs'). It is distinct from headline/news/section siblings, though it does not explicitly name an alternative tool.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as newsweek_headlines, newsweek_news, or other article tools. The description implies usage when a canonical article URL is available, but it does not state exclusions or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.