ticketmaster_attraction_events

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description bears the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states that it returns upcoming events and mentions the sort enum values, but it does not disclose pagination behavior (despite the page parameter), response structure, or any potential limitations. This is adequate but not extensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, consisting of three short sentences that convey the core purpose and a key parameter detail. There is no redundant or unnecessary information, and it is front-loaded with the primary function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a relatively simple list tool with 3 parameters and no output schema, the description covers the main functionality and sort options. However, it lacks details about pagination limits, the structure of returned events, and any prerequisites beyond the attraction ID, leaving some ambiguity for effective invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides descriptions for all three parameters (100% coverage). The description adds value by clarifying the sort enum accepts 'relevance' and 'date', which is not specified in the schema. This extra semantic detail justifies a score above the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'List an attraction's Ticketmaster events' with a specific verb and resource. It further clarifies that it returns 'upcoming Ticketmaster events for one attraction', distinguishing it from sibling tools like venue_events or search_events by its focus on a single attraction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates the tool is for retrieving events for a specific attraction, which implies it should be used when an attraction ID is available. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives (e.g., ticketmaster_search_events for broader search or ticketmaster_venue_events for venue-based queries) or provide when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.