Retrieve the Philippine Daily Inquirer section inventory, listing the ten public news subdomains accepted by inquirer-headlines. Returns clean JSON for direct use in automated workflows.
Get Philippine Daily Inquirer sections. Returns the Philippine Daily Inquirer section inventory: the ten public news subdomains accepted by inquirer-headlines.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.17.5Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the behavioral disclosure. It explicitly states what the tool returns (the section inventory) and that the sections are 'public news subdomains accepted by inquirer-headlines', which is useful. It doesn't mention side effects or auth, but for a read-only list operation this is sufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the purpose and immediately followed by a precise explanation of the output. Every sentence earns its place with no waste.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter tool with no output schema, the description provides all necessary information: what it does, what it returns, and its relevance to inquirer-headlines. Nothing is missing for an agent to correctly invoke it.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has no parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter information, which is appropriate since none exist.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the specific verb 'Get' and resource 'Philippine Daily Inquirer sections', and further specifies that it returns the section inventory of ten public news subdomains accepted by inquirer-headlines. This distinguishes it from sibling section tools for other publications.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description clearly indicates this is for Philippine Daily Inquirer sections and its relationship with inquirer-headlines, but it does not explicitly mention when to use it versus alternatives (e.g., other publication section tools). The context is clear enough for an agent to infer usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.