spotify_artist_albums

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must disclose behaviors. It only mentions 'Retrieve,' implying a read operation, but fails to describe auth requirements, rate limits, or the meaning of 'private Pathfinder responses.' The behavioral traits are insufficiently explained.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (two sentences) and front-loaded with the primary action. The second sentence adds jargon but no waste. It earns its brevity, though it could include more substance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and 6 optional parameters, the description should explain the return format and clarify that either uri or id is needed. It does not, leaving important usage gaps. The sibling tool list is large, and no cross-references are provided.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all 6 parameters, so the description adds minimal value. It does not elaborate on default values or combined usage of uri and id, but the schema is sufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves artist albums and returns discography items. However, it includes confusing jargon ('Spotify Web Player private Pathfinder responses') and does not differentiate from sibling tools like spotify_artist_playlists or spotify_artist_related.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as spotify_albums_search or spotify_artist. No exclusions or context for appropriate use are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.