Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

tes_job_employer

Retrieve a Tes employer profile by numeric ID to get school details, address, and all currently open job listings.

Instructions

Get a Tes jobs employer profile. Returns detail for one jobs employer profile by its numeric id (the trailing id in tes-job-detail's employer_url field, e.g. .../jobs/employer/epsom-college-1039424 -- the 1039424): name, location, school type/phase/funding status/gender/age range, an about description, its postal address, and every currently-open position listed on the employer's own profile page (id, title, url -- call tes-job-detail with each id for the full posting).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesTes employer id

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.16.2

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden, and it does disclose the return shape in detail (including that open positions list only id/title/url and require a follow-up call for the full posting). It doesn't cover auth or rate limits, but for a read-only profile fetch the disclosed behavior is substantial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single dense sentence, but front-loaded with the purpose and then the id-derivation example and return fields. The example earns its space; structure is logical though the length is on the heavier side.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description compensates by enumerating returned fields, and it covers the sibling composition (derive id from tes-job-detail, then re-enter tes-job-detail per posting). Complete enough to call the tool correctly; only external constraints like auth are unstated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% so the schema documents 'id' as 'Tes employer id', but the description adds real value by explaining precisely which id is wanted and giving a concrete URL example (.../jobs/employer/epsom-college-1039424). This meaningfully extends beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Get) and resource (Tes jobs employer profile), and details exactly what comes back (name, location, school attributes, address, open positions). It clearly distinguishes itself from the sibling tes-job-detail by explaining its role in that composition.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tells the agent how to obtain the required id (the trailing numeric id in tes-job-detail's employer_url) and instructs it to call tes-job-detail with each returned position id for full postings. Strong compositional guidance, though it doesn't state explicit when-not-to-use conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools