Fetch top stories from The Hindu's public Latest News feed, returning clean JSON for news aggregation and analysis.
Get The Hindu top stories. Returns fresh The Hindu top stories from its public "Latest News" feed.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.17.5Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It indicates a read-only operation by stating it 'Returns fresh The Hindu top stories from its public feed,' implying no destructive actions. However, it does not describe response format, pagination, or any limitations, which is a gap for a tool without annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise and front-loaded, but it repeats 'top stories' in both sentences, which is mildly redundant. Overall, it is efficient and to the point, with no unnecessary fluff.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description should clarify the return value. It says it returns 'top stories' but does not specify whether these are titles, links, full articles, or a structured list. The lack of an output schema increases the burden, and the description is somewhat vague about the actual response format.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, and the schema is empty. With no parameters to document, the description need not add parameter details. The baseline score for zero parameters is 4, and the description is sufficient.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves The Hindu top stories and specifies the source as the public 'Latest News' feed. It is specific about the resource and action, but it does not explicitly contrast with sibling tools like thehindu_article or thehindu_headlines, so it lacks full differentiation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention any conditions, exclusions, or sibling tools, leaving the agent to infer usage from the name and description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.