playstation_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden. It explicitly states 'Credential-free public PlayStation Store data', implying read-only. It describes the output (shelves and collection links) but omits rate limits or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured: main action, output, next steps, examples, parameter details. It is efficient but slightly wordy; every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, it describes the return structure (shelves, collection links with category_id) and provides known aliases. It lacks details on pagination or error states, but for a read-only page retrieval, it is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds value by explaining the roles of 'cc' (region/currency) and 'l' (language), and listing known alias values (collections, subscriptions, deals, latest). This goes beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description starts with 'Get a PlayStation Store merchandising page by alias', clearly stating the action and resource. It distinguishes from siblings by explaining how collection links lead to the separate 'playstation_category' tool, avoiding confusion.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides known aliases, explains the purpose of 'cc' and 'l', and describes the output structure with a clear next step (using category_id with playstation_category). However, it lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternative tool guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.