Retrieve a composite Numbeo country record by exact country name from the numbeo-countries dataset, returning structured JSON for country-level research and comparison.
Get a Numbeo country from the dataset. Returns one composite Numbeo country record by country name from dataset id enum value numbeo-countries.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| country | Yes | Country name as Numbeo spells it |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.5.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden but only states it returns a composite record. It does not disclose read-only nature, error handling, or any side effects, though the operation appears safe and straightforward.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise—two short sentences with no redundant information, making it easy to parse quickly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
While adequate for a simple retrieval tool, the description omits details about the output format (fields of the composite record) and how errors are handled (e.g., invalid country name). Given no output schema, more context would be beneficial.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema covers 100% of parameters, and the description adds 'as Numbeo spells it', which is helpful but does not significantly augment the schema's own description. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it retrieves a Numbeo country record by name from the datasets, distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'datasets_numbeo_countries_search' and 'datasets_numbeo_cities_item' by specifying the dataset id and the type of record.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies use for fetching a single country by exact name but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus search or other tools, and does not mention prerequisites or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.