boxofficemojo_genre

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided; the description carries full burden. It does not disclose behavioral traits like rate limits, authentication requirements, error handling, or data freshness. Only states it returns normalized release rows from a public page.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: first states purpose, second gives parameter constraint. No wasted words, front-loaded with essential information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (3 parameters, no output schema), the description covers purpose, return type, and parameter constraint. It could mention the output is a list of releases or link to sibling tools, but is adequate overall.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although the schema descriptions are minimal, the description adds meaningful guidance by specifying that exactly one parameter must be passed, and implies mutual exclusivity. This adds value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns normalized release rows from a Box Office Mojo genre page, and the instruction to pass exactly one identifier distinguishes it from sibling tools like boxofficemojo_genres (which lists genres).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear usage instruction (pass exactly one of id/path/url) but does not specify when to use this tool vs. alternatives like boxofficemojo_release or boxofficemojo_genres. No context on prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.