Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

fastcompany_sections

Retrieve Fast Company's section and topic inventory, including six primary verticals and all topic tags, each with a link to its RSS feed.

Instructions

Get Fast Company sections. Returns the Fast Company section/topic inventory: the site's six primary verticals (Tech, Work Life, News, Design, Leadership, Impact) plus every topic tag accepted by GET /fastcompany/headlines (78 values total, too many to enumerate inline -- see that endpoint for the full, current, live-verified list), each linking to its public RSS feed.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.17.5

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It explains what is returned (six verticals, 78 topic tags, RSS links) and notes the list is live-verified, which is helpful. However, it does not mention output format, pagination, or any access considerations, leaving some gaps for a no-annotation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, information-dense sentence that front-loads the core purpose and then adds only valuable specifics: the six verticals, the count of topic tags, the cross-reference to the headlines endpoint, and the RSS feed linkage. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless inventory tool, the description is largely complete: it states what is returned, the scope, and points to the related endpoint for the exhaustive list. It could specify the exact response shape, but the absence of parameters and output schema makes this a minor gap rather than a critical one.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and the schema coverage is 100%, so there is nothing for the description to add about parameters. The baseline of 4 applies here since no parameter documentation is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool gets Fast Company sections and returns the section/topic inventory, listing the six primary verticals and topic tags. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like fastcompany_headlines by explicitly referencing that endpoint for the full topic list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use this tool: to retrieve the section/topic inventory and RSS feeds. It also directs the agent to GET /fastcompany/headlines for the full list of topic tags, which provides useful routing context, though it does not explicitly state when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools