Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Crawlora MCP

Crawlora MCP

Official
by Crawlora-org
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

seatgeek_trending

Get SeatGeek's ranked trending events near a latitude and longitude, with names, URLs, start times, lowest prices, and rank changes.

Instructions

Get SeatGeek's trending-near-you events. Returns SeatGeek's ranked "trending near you" events for the required lat and lon. Each item has the event name, URL and image, local and UTC start times, lowest_price on the secondary market where available, current rank and rank_change. The list is identified by list_id, list_type and list_display_name.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
latYesLatitude
lonYesLongitude

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.17.5

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden; it does well by enumerating the returned fields (name, URL, image, times, lowest_price, rank, rank_change) and the list identifiers. It stops short of disclosing pagination, result limits, auth requirements, or how ranking is computed, which are meaningful gaps for a no-annotation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Opening sentence is front-loaded with the core action, followed by a compact enumeration of return fields. Slightly verbose in listing every field, but every clause carries information about the response shape.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description compensates by describing the item fields and list metadata in detail, giving an agent enough to interpret results. Remaining gaps (pagination, limits, error behavior) are minor for a simple two-parameter read tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with only lat/lon, so the schema already documents both parameters adequately. The description reinforces that lat/lon are required and that they define the "near you" scope, but adds no format or coordinate-system detail beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: fetches SeatGeek's "trending near you" events for a required lat/lon. The scope is clearly narrower than a generic events lookup, but it never names or contrasts the sibling seatgeek_events_near, leaving the agent to infer the difference.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the phrasing "trending-near-you events" and the required lat/lon, so an agent can guess this is a location-scoped discovery call. However, there is no explicit statement of when to prefer this over seatgeek_events_near or seatgeek_search, and no exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools