Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

cricbuzz_auction_teams

Retrieve Cricbuzz auction team purse and roster summaries for a chosen tournament edition and currency, with optional sorting by spent, remaining, players, or alphabetical order.

Instructions

Get Cricbuzz auction team purse and roster summaries. Returns every team row for one selected edition and currency. Discover exact currency choices through auction/seasons and sort labels through auction/teams/options. Valid sort labels are Alphabetical, Spent: High to Low, Spent: Low to High, Remaining: High to Low, Remaining: Low to High, Players: High to Low and Players: Low to High.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sortNoSort label from auction/teams/options: Alphabetical, Spent: High to Low, Spent: Low to High, Remaining: High to Low, Remaining: Low to High, Players: High to Low, Players: Low to High; defaults to the upstream default
yearYesEdition from cricbuzz/auction/seasons: IPL 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026; WPL 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027; SA20 2027; HUNM 2026; HUNW 2026
currencyYesCurrency accepted by the selected edition: INR, USD, EUR, GBP, AUD, CAD, NZD, AED, ZAR, PKR, LKR, BDT, NPR
tournamentYesTournament identifier from cricbuzz/auction/seasons: ipl, wpl, sa20, hunm, hunw

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.17.18

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden. It discloses that the tool returns every team row for one edition and currency, and it lists valid sort labels, but it does not cover permissions, rate limits, pagination, or error behavior. For a read-only 'Get' operation this is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded and purpose-first. It is reasonably sized, though listing all sort labels duplicates schema content and is the most expendable part of the description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a four-parameter read tool with no output schema, the description is fairly complete: it states what rows are returned, how edition and currency scope the result, and where to discover valid values. It could say more about the returned fields, but the core shape is clear.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all four parameters are already documented with valid values. The description adds a useful discovery pointer for currency and sort labels, but otherwise largely repeats sort-label information already present in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb and resource: 'Get Cricbuzz auction team purse and roster summaries.' It also clarifies the scope as 'every team row for one selected edition and currency,' which distinguishes it from the singular auction team tool and the options/seasons helpers.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides clear usage context: the tool requires one selected edition and currency, and it directs the agent to auction/seasons for currency choices and auction/teams/options for sort labels. It does not explicitly name when to prefer a sibling tool, but the context is strong enough to guide correct invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools