psastore_search_suggest

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full behavioral burden. It discloses that the endpoint is credential-free and that the storefront URL is fixed server-side, adding useful context. However, it does not explicitly state that the operation is read-only or describe any side effects, rate limits, or error behavior. It adds some context beyond the schema but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with zero waste. It front-loads the purpose, then adds the technical context (endpoint type, fixed URL). Well-structured and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple search suggestion tool with 3 parameters and no output schema, the description provides enough to invoke correctly (required q, optional limit/types). It mentions return content types but does not describe the response structure or pagination details. The fixed URL context is helpful, but the lack of response format info makes it slightly incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for all three parameters (q, limit, types), so the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional parameter semantics or usage hints beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb (get) and resource (PSA Store search suggestions), and explicitly lists the return types: products, collections, and query suggestions. It also identifies the endpoint as a predictive search and the source domain, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like psastore_product or psastore_collections.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied: it fetches search suggestions, presumably for autocomplete or suggestion features. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus other PSA Store tools or any alternatives, nor does it mention exclusions or conditions. No clear when-to/not-to guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.