Skip to main content
Glama
Crawlora-org

Crawlora MCP

Official

everlane_products

List Everlane products from the public product catalog by page and limit, returning structured JSON for e-commerce research and monitoring.

Instructions

List Everlane products. Returns products from Everlane's (https://www.everlane.com) public product catalog. The storefront URL is fixed server-side. Valid empty result pages return 200 with an empty products array.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo1-based page, defaults to 1
limitNoMaximum products, defaults to 50 and supports up to 250

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.16.0

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden. It usefully discloses that the catalog is public, that the storefront URL is fixed server-side, and that empty pages return HTTP 200 with an empty products array, but it omits other relevant context such as pagination limits beyond what the schema states or rate-limiting behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three short sentences and front-loads the core action before supplemental details. There is slight redundancy between 'List Everlane products' and 'Returns products from Everlane's public product catalog,' but overall it is efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given there is no output schema, the description should ideally describe the return shape more fully. It mentions products and empty arrays but does not explain what fields a product contains or the pagination metadata available, leaving the agent with only a high-level sense of the response.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already explains both the page and limit parameters clearly. The description adds no additional meaning or syntax for those parameters, making the baseline score of 3 appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb ('List') and resource ('Everlane products'), making the core purpose immediately understandable. However, it does not explicitly differentiate this tool from siblings such as everlane_product, everlane_collections, or everlane_search_suggest, so an agent still has to infer which listing tool is appropriate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of alternatives like everlane_collections or everlane_product. The description merely asserts what the tool does without helping an agent decide when to select it over related Everlane tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools